Re: Hints on kernel config for a dula pII/450 system anyone?

["Sepherosa Ziehau" <sepherosa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Oops, sorry.  the attached patch is against 1.6 release.

Best Regards,
sephe

On 9/18/06, Gergo Szakal <bastyaelvtars@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> > The problem may be caused by that second skc's skc_probe()
> > reinitializes a global "sk_serializer"
> >
> > Please try the attached patch.
> >
>
> Thanks, but the patch fails to apply successfully against the 20060912
> snapshot of 1.6-release, here is what I get:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> %patch < /root/sk.diff
> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |--- if_sk.c.orig       2006-09-18 09:20:58.514614912 -0400
> |+++ if_sk.c    2006-09-18 09:28:54.199299848 -0400
> --------------------------
> Patching file if_sk.c using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 261.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1075 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #3 failed at 1164.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1312 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 1326 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1424 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #7 failed at 1507.
> 2 out of 7 hunks failed--saving rejects to if_sk.c.rej
> Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |--- if_skreg.h.orig    2006-09-18 09:21:52.348430928 -0400
> |+++ if_skreg.h 2006-09-18 09:24:14.550812880 -0400
> --------------------------
> Patching file if_skreg.h using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1434.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1463.
> done
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sorry to be a pain in the a**, I'd fix this if I could.


--
Live Free or Die

Attachment: sk1.diff
Description: Binary data