Re: BIND 9.3 in base

[Hiten Pandya <hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> walt wrote:
> <cut>>
>
> > IMO the reason IPV6 has not been pushed in the U.S. is that Micro$oft
> > thinks it is not important for their bottom line.  When and if that
> > time arrives you can bet that the adoption of IPV6 in the U.S. will be
> > $wift (and expen$ive for M$ cu$tomer$).
> >
> > No, I'm not cynical -- my wife is entirely wrong about that...
>
>
> Microsoft perhaps not tends to promote IPv6 public but they do have it 
> implemented in 2003 server and XP. So their equal on that subject with 
> SUN, Novell, Red Hat, Oracle and just about every other bigger IT 
> related company I am aware of.

I am pretty sure that the Windows 2003 MCSE literature explains how to
setup IPv6 as well.  IPv6 pickup in UK is slow as well; but then again
with a lot of things, UK will never come out of the dark ages. :-)

				Hiten