Re: BIND 9.3 in base

["Martin P. Hellwig" <mhellwig@xxxxxxxxx>]

walt wrote:
<cut>>
> IMO the reason IPV6 has not been pushed in the U.S. is that Micro$oft
> thinks it is not important for their bottom line.  When and if that
> time arrives you can bet that the adoption of IPV6 in the U.S. will be
> $wift (and expen$ive for M$ cu$tomer$).
>
> No, I'm not cynical -- my wife is entirely wrong about that...

Microsoft perhaps not tends to promote IPv6 public but they do have it 
implemented in 2003 server and XP. So their equal on that subject with 
SUN, Novell, Red Hat, Oracle and just about every other bigger IT 
related company I am aware of.

Bashing MS is perhaps easy but I feel it is not relevant in this 
specific subject.

However I am biased as I use much MS technology, just about the same as 
I use Apple's, BSD's, Solaris and Linux combined.
The trick for me is to use the right technology at the right place, the 
difficulty for me is to find the right match.
I do not use non-windows because I dislike MS but because I prefer a BSD 
licensed unix like system.

--
mph