[no subject]

190348.GA87539@venus.xenno.com> <C5616CEE-2816-4E66-846D-40029E634186@gmail.com>
From: "Alex Hornung" <ahornung@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: wlan_ratectl (was Re: firmware discussion)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:17:53 +0100
BestServHost: crater.dragonflybsd.org
List-Post: <mailto:kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-Help: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: 
Sender: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Errors-To: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Lines: 15
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.240.41.25
X-Trace: 1269980621 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 55378 216.240.41.25
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:14203

: : This won't get into FreeBSD as is. The fact is that we have a small
: : amount of code to handle with the rate control framework, but the
: rate
: : control framework isn't written yet.
: 
: So why exactly is our wlan ratectl not acceptable for FreeBSD? What is
: so bad about it?

After a chat on IRC it seems that it won't go into FreeBSD because of the
fact that they already started a similar effort. I didn't see the explicit
link in the original mail, but if others did, just ignore me :)

Cheers,
Alex Hornung