[no subject]

190348.GA87539@venus.xenno.com> <C5616CEE-2816-4E66-846D-40029E634186@gmail.com>
From: "Alex Hornung" <ahornung@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: wlan_ratectl (was Re: firmware discussion)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:01:53 +0100
BestServHost: crater.dragonflybsd.org
List-Post: <mailto:kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-Help: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <C5616CEE-2816-4E66-846D-40029E634186@gmail.com>
Sender: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Errors-To: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Lines: 10
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.240.41.25
X-Trace: 1269979604 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 55377 216.240.41.25
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:14202

: This won't get into FreeBSD as is. The fact is that we have a small
: amount of code to handle with the rate control framework, but the rate
: control framework isn't written yet.

So why exactly is our wlan ratectl not acceptable for FreeBSD? What is so
bad about it?

Cheers,
Alex Hornung