Re: configuration files

[Dave Leimbach <leimySPAM2k@xxxxxxx>]

Richard Coleman <Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> > -On [20031211 21:02], Richard Coleman (Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >
> >> Well, I wasn't necessarily arguing for using xml or any other
> >> specific format.  But since I'm bored at work, I'll put on my
> >> bikeshed helmet and throw in my thoughts.
> > Could you please refrain from already labeling a discussion a
> > bikeshed?
> > It makes me want to stop participating in these discussions.  Because
> > then it is basically said: hey, I am wondering about X, but since I know
> > it is futile we'll just talk.  Personally I like to treat each
> > discussion/idea as something possibly worthwhile to invest a lot of time
> > in.
> 
> I thought it was obvious this was a joke.  I guess not.
> 
> Personally, I think it is a very interesting discussion and a topic
> that I've thought about alot about over the years.  And although I
> will talk about it as much as people can tolerate, I will admit that I
> think it is a futile discussion.  Sorry, but I'm just being honest.

Perhaps only futile as it pertains to DragonFly but perhaps not to
others who may want to hash out such a discussion later.  This stuff
gets logged and subsequently googled :).

SO FOR ALL YOU GOOGLERS OUT THERE SEARCHING FOR PORN 
[insert dirty porn stuff...]

Dave :)

> 
> Richard Coleman
> Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx