Re: configuration files

[Richard Coleman <Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20031211 21:02], Richard Coleman (Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> > Well, I wasn't necessarily arguing for using xml or any other specific 
> > format.  But since I'm bored at work, I'll put on my bikeshed helmet and 
> > throw in my thoughts.
>
>
> Could you please refrain from already labeling a discussion a bikeshed?
> It makes me want to stop participating in these discussions.  Because
> then it is basically said: hey, I am wondering about X, but since I know
> it is futile we'll just talk.  Personally I like to treat each
> discussion/idea as something possibly worthwhile to invest a lot of time
> in.

I thought it was obvious this was a joke.  I guess not.

Personally, I think it is a very interesting discussion and a topic that 
I've thought about alot about over the years.  And although I will talk 
about it as much as people can tolerate, I will admit that I think it is 
a futile discussion.  Sorry, but I'm just being honest.

Richard Coleman
Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx