Re: Linux emulation

[Robert Garrett <rg70@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:

> 
> :-On [20030806 20:32], Matthew Dillon (dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> :>    I haven't had a chance to try to reproduce it myself but I
> :>    suspect that the issues are real and need to be addressed.
> :
> :Well, I think they're real too. ;)
> :
> :But right now I am trying to figure out why man is suddenly barfing on
> :the permissions.
> :
> :Rob still needs to revert the commit though, although 't might be ok to
> :leave it for now, otherwise man/catN/ will be riddled with temporary
> :files.
> :
> :--
> :Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai
> 
>     I think my last email to Rob was "This doesn't look right at all"
>     or something like that :-).  I think that patch needs to be reverted
>     too.
> 
> -Matt
It is not right that is a fact. However there is another issue there,
and I am not sure what it is. At this point in time thats the minimum
permissions to get it to work cleanly. Which is a sorry state. I am 
looking into what the real issue is, and when I figure it out, I will
change them back.

Rob