DragonFly BSD
DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2013-05
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Postgresql 9.1 benchmark (on KVM guests)


From: Loïc BLOT <loic.blot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:17:42 +0200

--=-SHBKkb264rk6MWpogOR8
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-oIjwwNcjBhUwiGw7Y1gf"


--=-oIjwwNcjBhUwiGw7Y1gf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ahem, sorry for the happiness.
Linux ext4 with nobarrier option (crazy option, you must only use it
with raid controller) debrid all the FS.=20
Here are the updated stats:

http://www.unix-experience.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Benchmarks-PostGre=
SQL4.pdf

But DragonFlyBSD performances are very good
--=20
Best regards,
Lo=C3=AFc BLOT,=20
UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr




Le lundi 20 mai 2013 =C3=A0 22:21 +0200, Lo=C3=AFc BLOT a =C3=A9crit :

> Hi all,
> this evening i made a benchmark on 5 configurations, to compare
> performances between systems. When i will get a real server i will do
> the same on it, but for now, i did it on a KVM host (libvirt).
> I want to share you the results of this PostgreSQL benchmark (yes it's
> a fresh postgresql install John Marino :p).
>=20
> http://www.unix-experience.fr/2013/2451/
>=20
> Great performance to DragonFlyBSD 3.4.1 ! Good job guys !
>=20
> Have a nice week.
>=20

--=-oIjwwNcjBhUwiGw7Y1gf
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; CHARSET=3DUTF-8">
  <META NAME=3D"GENERATOR" CONTENT=3D"GtkHTML/4.6.5">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Ahem, sorry for the happiness.<BR>
Linux ext4 with nobarrier option (crazy option, you must only use it with r=
aid controller) debrid all the FS. <BR>
Here are the updated stats:<BR>
<BR>
<A HREF=3D"http://www.unix-experience.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Benchma=
rks-PostGreSQL4.pdf">http://www.unix-experience.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/=
05/Benchmarks-PostGreSQL4.pdf</A><BR>
<BR>
But DragonFlyBSD performances are very good<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING=3D"0" CELLPADDING=3D"0" WIDTH=3D"100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<PRE>
--=20
Best regards,
Lo&#239;c BLOT,=20
UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr

</PRE>
<BR>
<BR>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
Le lundi 20 mai 2013 &#224; 22:21 +0200, Lo&#239;c BLOT a &#233;crit&nbsp;:=
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE>
    Hi all,<BR>
    this evening i made a benchmark on 5 configurations, to compare perform=
ances between systems. When i will get a real server i will do the same on =
it, but for now, i did it on a KVM host (libvirt).<BR>
    I want to share you the results of this PostgreSQL benchmark (yes it's =
a fresh postgresql install John Marino :p).<BR>
    <BR>
    <A HREF=3D"http://www.unix-experience.fr/2013/2451/";>http://www.unix-ex=
perience.fr/2013/2451/</A><BR>
    <BR>
    Great performance to DragonFlyBSD 3.4.1 ! Good job guys !<BR>
    <BR>
    Have a nice week.<BR>
    <TABLE CELLSPACING=3D"0" CELLPADDING=3D"0" WIDTH=3D"100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<BR>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-oIjwwNcjBhUwiGw7Y1gf--

--=-SHBKkb264rk6MWpogOR8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EABEIAAYFAlGaoQYACgkQh290DZyz8uZoVgD9FcxQcHElsMwZeA4/s3JbmxHT
or1tIJZNwiGZjtdpO7oBAMoms3UWPvxhOb2QJ6VIhWdplitBojW1+vVoWit9cNEz
=4vrU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-SHBKkb264rk6MWpogOR8--



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]