DragonFly BSD
DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2013-04
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dummynet + PF + vkernel


From: Raimundo Santos <raitech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:14:26 -0300

--001a11c1ed500d6a9d04da2b5d1c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 12 April 2013 02:58, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> You could use ALTQ fairq w/ PF, which is similar to dummynet's WF2Q
>
> Best Regards,
> sephe
>
> --
> Tomorrow Will Never Die
>

Hum... but I need to do a hard limiting to all my customers. They have a
unique IP address, so I can decide about the bandwidth (here, we are about
to implement RADIUS to do auth too). The ideia here is to

1. limit external in/out traffic
2. do QoS over this limited traffic

I have an average of 600 clients at the same time, so I think that FAIRQ
could be a good thing but not to hard limiting every IP.

If I offer three kinds of bandwidth to my customers, may I define three
subclasses in FAIRQ and let the traffic of the right kinds go through the
right queues? I think it does not work: if someone is hogging that queue,
what the others will end up with?

--=20
--------------------------------------------
Raimundo A. P. Santos
Bacharelando em Inform=E1tica
ICMC - USP

--001a11c1ed500d6a9d04da2b5d1c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On 12 April 2013 02:58, Sepherosa Ziehau <span dir=3D"ltr"=
>&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sepherosa@gmail.com"; target=3D"_blank">sepherosa@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gm=
ail_quote">

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im"><br>
</div>You could use ALTQ fairq w/ PF, which is similar to dummynet&#39;s WF=
2Q<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
sephe<br>
<br>
--<br>
Tomorrow Will Never Die<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Hum... but I need to do a hard limiting to all my cu=
stomers. They have a unique IP address, so I can decide about the bandwidth=
 (here, we are about to implement RADIUS to do auth too). The ideia here is=
 to</div>

<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">1. limit ex=
ternal in/out traffic</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">2. do QoS over this l=
imited traffic</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmai=
l_extra">

I have an average of 600 clients at the same time, so I think that FAIRQ co=
uld be a good thing but not to hard limiting every IP.</div><div class=3D"g=
mail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">If I offer three kinds of =
bandwidth to my customers, may I define three subclasses in FAIRQ and let t=
he traffic of the right kinds go through the right queues? I think it does =
not work: if someone is hogging that queue, what the others will end up wit=
h?=A0<br clear=3D"all">

<div><br></div>-- <br>--------------------------------------------<br>Raimu=
ndo A. P. Santos<br>Bacharelando em Inform=E1tica<br>ICMC - USP
</div></div>

--001a11c1ed500d6a9d04da2b5d1c--



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]