DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2012-10
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: DragonFly won't boot on qemu-kvm-1.0
:It works fine with -no-kvm, which is how I was able to update /usr/src
:and build a new world and kernel (although it took >24h)
:
:HAMMER(ROOT) recovery nexto 3000000003848338 endseqno=00442468
:HAMMER(ROOT) mounted clean, no recovery needed
:DMA space used: 144k, remaining available: 16384k
:
:
:Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
:cpuid = 0; lapic->id = 00000000
:instruction pointer = 0x8:0xffffffff80898a02
:stack pointer = 0x10:0xffffffe00e457c00
:frame pointer = 0x10:0xffffffe003218bb0
:code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
:= DPL 0, pres 1, long 0, def32 0, gran 1
:processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0
:current process = 1
:current thread = pri 10 (CRIT)
:kernel: type 9 trap, code=0
:
:CPU0 stopping CPUs: 0x00000000
: stopped
:Stopped at cpu_heavy_restore+0x72: movl %ecx,%cr3
:db> trace
:cpu_heavy_restore() at cpu_heavy_restore+0x72 0xffffffff80898a02
:tsleep() at tsleep+0x5ab 0xffffffff80509071
:dfly_helper_thread() at dfly_helper_thread+0x324 0xffffffff804f7de5
:db> show registers
:cs 0x8 gd_curthread
:ss 0x10 gd_curthread+0x8
:rax 0xffffffe00e465870
:rcx 0x3dfdc007
:rdx 0xffffffe00e457ce0
:rbx 0xffffffff82248ae8 dfly_pcpu+0x8
:rsp 0xffffffe00e457c10
:rbp 0xffffffe003218bb0
:rsi 0x349c000
:rdi 0xffffffe00e465870
:rip 0xffffffff80898a02 cpu_heavy_restore+0x72
:rfl 0x202 gd_cnt+0x18e
:r8 0xffffffff82249610 dfly_pcpu+0xb30
:r9 0xfffffdff
:r10 0
:r11 0xffffffff822490a0 dfly_pcpu+0x5c0
:r12 0xffffffe00e465870
:r13 0xffffffff82248ae8 dfly_pcpu+0x8
:r14 0xffffffe00e465870
:r15 0
:dr0 0
:dr1 0
:dr2 0
:dr3 0
:dr4 0xffff0ff0
:dr5 0x400 gd_cnt+0x38c
:dr6 0xffff0ff0
:dr7 0x400 gd_cnt+0x38c
:cpu_heavy_restore+0x72: movl %ecx,%cr3
:db>
:
:What can I do to help diagnose this?
It's basically dying on an instruction that it shouldn't be
dying on. All I can think of is that the linux hw kvm stuff
isn't implementing the instruction properly, or that it is
not reporting physical memory properly.
This would need a kvm expert to figure out. The register
state looks correct, but we could try to match up %rcx's
physical memory address against the list of memory regions.
If you boot the kernel verbose and record the entire dmesg output
we can match those up to see if they are reasonable.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]