Re: appropriate location for hammer snapshots

[Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

:Yes I checked it for both Master and Slave PFS the meta-data does get mirrored.
:Some of them has 'migrated' at the end of it what does it mean?
:
:0x000000017627d370      2010-02-02 03:18:00 IST migrated
:0x0000000176b5ef40      2010-02-03 03:18:00 IST migrated
:0x00000001782a85e0      2010-02-04 03:18:21 IST
:0x00000001782d0370      2010-02-05 03:18:17 IST

    'migrated' is just in the comment field for the snapshot.
    The comment field can be set when making manual snapshots
    too.

:is it possible to access the snapshot If I know the TID?
:So as of now is it that I lost all the snapshots for my slave and I
:have to manually  take snapshots of of the Slave PFS and store it some
:where outside the PFS untill something is implemented for
:regeneration?
:...
:Yes Matt thanks :-)
:
:--Siju

    Yes, just use a similar path to the way the softlinks are
    constructed, using the TID, e.g.:

    cd <fs>/@@0x000000017627d370

    The snapshots are still there (pruning is governed by
    the snapshot list in the meta-data).  If you want a
    convenient set of softlinks you can construct them
    by writing a little script based on the snapls output.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>