Re: DragonFly 2.4.1 Released!

[Saifi Khan <saifi.khan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Niklas Rosencrantz wrote:

> 2009/10/9 Saifi Khan <saifi.khan@datasynergy.org>
> 
> > On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Erik Wikstr?m wrote:
> >
> > > My proposal is that instead of releasing the code as X.Y.0 first make a
> > > X.Y.0 RC (Release Candidate). While the RC might not see as much usage
> >
> > you make a valid point.
> >
> > Now for the same users, it may be a good idea to make the tag
> > more search friendly as well.
> >
> > Perhaps something like
> >  x.y-rc
> >
> > and thus a .0 release has a clean tag 2.4.0 for example and
> > search engine results are cleaner, since they are not littered
> > with 2.4.0-RC and 2.4.0-RC2 etc.
> >
> > What do you think ?
> >
> 
> Trivial: the less numbers and more natural toward user the better. "dev"
> "test" and "prod" are natural + POSIX time is very easy and natural to
> understand and standard. 1 scriptsyncbuild conveniently mnemoniced (eg
> "autorenew") to adjust whole thing, "autorenew" or likewise get latest
> version from preferred order hg,git,svn,cvs. now don't now how to make
> git-clone bit in the dark still super stable.
> 
> 

Thats nice, in that case the releases can be given a codename like:
 Claremont
 Merriwood
 Sibley
 Huckleberry
 Wildcat
 Tilden
 Layafette
 Chabot
 Devaney
 Garin
 Coyote

Btw, the above are all reserve parks and there should be plenty
of DragonFly's around :-)


thanks
Saifi.