Re: Fedora developer interested in DMA; query about build process

["Justin C. Sherrill" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, September 2, 2009 1:37 pm, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
>>     Well, not tarballs.  The idea is to keep it in git so third parties
>> can
>>     track and merge it trivially.
>
> The problem with creating another repo is that *we* can't merge trivially
> from it.  I think tarballs are the best option.

Would it work having vendor branches for these things like we do now for
tcpdump/libpcap/etc?  We'd have the original branch too, but it may make
life easier if these technologies spread out and we have patches to
integrate back in.

How does OpenBSD handle OpenSSH and other broken-out items?