DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2007-08
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[no subject]
alhost> <200708121834.l7CIYSlR045164@apollo.backplane.com>
From: "Dennis den Brok" <d.den.brok@uni-bonn.de>
Subject: Re: RealTek 8168B/8111B, new revision (ISO-request)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:11:51 +0200
BestServHost: crater.dragonflybsd.org
List-Post: <mailto:users@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:users-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-users@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <200708121834.l7CIYSlR045164@apollo.backplane.com>
Sender: users-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Errors-To: users-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Lines: 21
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.240.41.25
X-Trace: 1186964358 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 846 216.240.41.25
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.users:9886
Am 12.08.2007, 20:34 Uhr, schrieb Matthew Dillon
<dillon@apollo.backplane.com>:
> Hmm. Well, fdisk tries to autosense the sector size but I guess
> it isn't working as expected.
>
> Try this patch.
Well, the two kernel messages about the sector size disappeared; however,
fdisk keeps complaining about "length" not being a multiple of the sector
size. I'm not sure whether this warning/error is fatal in the sense that
it would cause the installer to abort -- is it? I'm also not sure if the
sector size the stick appears to have is actually correct... maybe it's
detected incorrectly?
Regarding my initial problem with re(4): If sephe's byteswap-patch made it
into the ISO from an hour ago, I'm sorry to say it doesn't seem to fix the
problems with IPv6.
--
Dennis den Brok
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]