Re: [patch] Multiple ips for jails

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> At least the IPv6 case is incomplete as it doesn't deal with mapped ipv4
> addresses. I also don't think the behaviour for INADDR_ANY is correct.

Could you elaborate on that?  How should mapped ipv4 addresses be handled?  I guess there would need to be a check for already used ipv4 addresses, and vice versa.

What behaviour for INADDR_ANY would be correct?  (If you can use this term)

cheers
 simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature