Re: STLport?

["Yury Tarasievich" <yury.tarasievich@xxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, that's your blessed right.

So, how about some ideas on what to use instead?

---

On 01/08/06, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:29:55PM +0300, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> > The next major show-stopper is the absence (as perceived by the g++
> > and by the naked eye) of the struct __FILE and of the appropriate
> > member fields stlport expects.
>
> Which is the ultimate reason why I refuse to touch it. No program has
> the right to assume anything about the size of FILE, period.
>
> Joerg