Re: GNU make not installed

["Justin C. Sherrill" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, April 19, 2006 9:19 am, joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:06:37AM -0400, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
>> Is there a reason we would not want this to be default behavior?  i.e.
>> release with DEPENDS_TARGET and BINPKG_SITES defined?
>
> Because you want to build from source to get specific options etc.?
> BINPKG_SITES with a default value would make sense though.


Wouldn't people who want to build from source with specific options be
doing 'bmake (options) install"?