DragonFly BSD
DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2005-08
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compatability with FreeBSD Ports [debian package tools]


To: Chris Pressey <cpressey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Hiten Pandya <hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:02:02 +0100
Cc: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

bec.de> <4302762D.70904@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <4302762D.70904@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.18.88.18
X-Trace: 1124236935 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 742 82.18.88.18
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.users:3837

Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Can we not just go with an established packaging suite like the one 
> found in Debian and modify it for our use?
> 
> It's certainly more established than pkgsrc, and has more packages.
> 
>             Hiten Pandya
>             hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

It might be worth for interested parties to look at the "Smart Package 
Manager," written in Python and can be used in conjunction with the Debian 
package tools, i.e. APT, DPKG, etc.

http://zorked.net/smart/doc/README.html

If we ever go down the route of using APT, which I think we should, now 
that I look at it more and more, the Smart Package Manager could be quite 
a worthwhile tool make use of, it also fits perfectly well with our 
overall goal of using Python related scripting;

The more I read about what is available out there, pkgsrc and ports make 
look like the Dark Ages.

Chris, you might want to have a look at the above URL too, since you were 
also interested in Python based package solutions.

			-Hiten
			Hiten Pandya
			hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]