Re: symlink app lib to common libs

[Yaroslav Tarasenko <tarasenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Walter пишет:
> Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:13:18 +0200
> >
> >     OK - so you only package the libs with unstable APIs :)
>
>
> (Non-guru type here again)  Would it make sense to have a
> "lib" directory in each app's folder, as was suggested,
> and then symlink to the actual library?  This way there
> could be one actual library that is updated easily, and
> still allow some apps to hold on to the older library
> version by re-linking as needed.
>
> I know I don't know enough about this to describe what I'm
> thinking appropriately, but it works in my head. <g>

You should look at encap (www.encap.org, if i'm not mistaken). It plays 
with symlinks.