Re: Version numbering for release DECISION!

[Raphael Marmier <raphael@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eduardo Tongson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:07:25 -0800, Chris Pressey
> <cpressey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I agree 100% that the names should indicate the _purpose_ of the thing
> > rather than its state or circumstances, simply because most people will
> > be more interested in its purpose than in other factors.
> >
> > So PRODUCTION is a better name than STABLE, DEVELOPMENT is a better name
> > than UNTESTED or CURRENT, and PREVIEW is a better name than WORKING.
>
> DEVELOPMENT
> PREVIEW
> PRODUCTION
>
> sound nice too and easily comprehended by the unwashed masses
cool! I vote fo it!

Raphael