Re: Loader not found

[Bill Hacker <wbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

onflybsd.org> <20050315220419.499a9fd6.cpressey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4237d427$0$717$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <594785395.20050316090305@xxxxxx> <4237ee3c$0$717$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <833877638.20050316103422@xxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <833877638.20050316103422@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <423895a3$0$716$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.253.82.16
X-Trace: 1111004579 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 716 218.253.82.16
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.users:2198

Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:

> 
> For me, BSD on the desktop will become an option the day there's a

In use here since 4.9, GNOME.  Looking DragonFlyBSD 'soon'

OS/2 has lagged in ssh/sl and multi-lingual, (trading HKG stock market).

> stable, perhaps even supported JDK (I need it for school). Which is
> probably like never.
> 

Do you mean there is a good (better than *N*X?)  JDK for Windows,
or (what other platform)??

FWIHS - Java is way too 'partially encumbered' or 'strategically encumbered'
by Sun to be of much interest. Half fish, half fowl.

I don't see JDK as 'of interest' to the *BSD's in general - despite a lot
of folks who might want to work in it.  But if it *is* to 'live' on a
*BSD, I expect DragonFly to have an edge due to more modern
architecture.

Bill