RE: Compiling apache 1.3.33, php and postgres

["Adrian Nida" <nida@xxxxxxxx>]

> On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Jonas Trollvik wrote:
> > How come none of these major vendors chose not to include dragonfly in
> > their configs? (everything was latest release)
> 
> Because the maintainers of autoconf haven't released a new version which
> includes the entries FOR OVER ONE YEAR. Not many developers know how to
> get the current (read: most up-to-date) files from ftp.gnu.org. Actually
> before DragonFly I didn't know it myself.
> 
> BTW, why didn't you use ports? E.g. databases/php4-pgsql is the PostgreSQL
> module for PHP 4.
> 
> Joerg

I didn't know that port existed.  When I built this (the only exception
being Apache 2), I just edited the configure arguments for the mod-php5
Makefile to use pgsql.  That worked for me.

Anyway Jonas, from one user to another yes, please submit your patches
upstream.  The only harm you can get is they'll say "No."

Adrian