DragonFly submit List (threaded) for 2010-10
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: [issue1866] [PATCH] ucom - destroy device node on detach
> Hey,
Hi,
> Just for readability, I think it would be better not to have two = on the same
> line here.
Well, it's common in C for assigning the same value to multiple variables
that way, but I don't insist on that point here :)
I'm going to commit this in a few days if no objections raised.
Cheers.
diff --git a/sys/dev/usbmisc/ucom/ucom.c b/sys/dev/usbmisc/ucom/ucom.c
index f85c3b7..66ccc53 100644
--- a/sys/dev/usbmisc/ucom/ucom.c
+++ b/sys/dev/usbmisc/ucom/ucom.c
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ ucom_attach(struct ucom_softc *sc)
UID_UUCP, GID_DIALER, 0660,
"ucom%d", unit);
dev->si_tty = tp;
+ sc->dev = dev;
lwkt_reltoken(&tty_token);
return (0);
@@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ ucom_detach(struct ucom_softc *sc)
DPRINTF(("ucom_detach: sc = %p, tp = %p\n", sc, sc->sc_tty));
+ destroy_dev(sc->dev);
lwkt_gettoken(&tty_token);
sc->sc_dying = 1;
--
1.7.0.5
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]