From: | Eirik Nygaard <eirikn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 18 Apr 2004 12:49:06 +0200 |
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 05:56:38PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:14:48 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > This is great work, Eirik. Is the new methodology for contrib easy > > to deal with? > > As for me, I would say yes and I like this method better. :-) > > Anyway, I am wondering if there's standard of method to import? Like for > example same name of file and etc: > > Eirik: > contrib/awk20040207/DRAGONFLY-upgrade (no checksum, all in one) > contrib/diffutils-2.8.1/DRAGONFLY-upgrade (no checksum, all in one) > > Matt: > contrib/binutils-2.14/README.DELETED > contrib/binutils-2.14/README.DRAGONFLY > contrib/gcc-3.3/README.DELETED > contrib/gcc-3.3/README.DRAGONFLY > > I am not trying to make weird, but I think it would be nice if they all > are doing in the same way. So, I can know what to looking for the > contrib/*/README.[DELETED|DRAGONFLY] without have to go in the directories > and find out that it was DAGONFLY-upgrade or different name of text files. > > Just throw my 0.2 cent worth, before there are getting many.. As for a checksum I should probably add as well, I just never really thought about that, but it is a good point. I will start doing it from now on, starting with the less update. As for the two vs. one file thing I think using two files for the updates I have done so far at least would be overkill. There is not that many files I need to remove from the original archieves. -- Eirik Nygaard eirikn@xxxxxxxxxxxx Never let a computer know you're in a hurry.
Attachment:
pgp00007.pgp
Description: PGP signature