Re: tiny improvement to config(8)

[Chris Pressey <cpressey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>     This doesn't really have anything to do with backwards
>     compatibility. In fact, just removing the warning is more
>     backwards compatible then adding a -q option that older config
>     binaries don't support.

I guess I meant "compatible with existing scripts sysops may have
written which expect (too strictly) certain output from config(8)"

>     I'll remove the warning.
> 
> 					-Matt
> 					Matthew Dillon 
> 					<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-Chris