Re: syscall separation part 5a

["David P. Reese, Jr." <daver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:19:48AM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> 	Also, you might wanna look at a Linux related PR from the
> 	FreeBSD GNATS database.  It adds three new linux emulated
> 	syscalls, but because it uses the stackgap() stuff, I thought
> 	I would pass it on to you, if you don't mind 8-) :
> 
> 	a] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/55835
> 	
> 	   This PR is for addressing the issue with the SETALL
> 	   Linux system call.
> 
> 	b] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/45785
> 
> 	   This PR adds two/three new Linux system calls, IIRC,
> 	   it is linux_mmap2(), linux_ftruncat64() and
> 	   linux_truncat64().
> 
> 	Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Hiten Pandya
> hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I'll take a look at these after I cut my next linux emulator patch.  Thanks
for the pointer.

These will probably be merged with the stackgap allocations because there
are still a ton of syscalls that I have to split to finish the emulator
work.

I'm not even sure which project I'm working on anymore.  Am I removing
COMPAT_43 from the tree or removing stackgap allocations from the emulators?
Heh, I guess I'll have to do both.

-- 
   David P. Reese, Jr.                                     daver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
                                               http://www.gomerbud.com/daver/