Re: syscall separation part 2

["David P. Reese Jr." <daver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
> David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
>> The second patch makes linux emulation use the syscalls that were split
>> in the above patch.
>> 
>> http://gomerbud.com/daver/patches/dragonfly/linux-no43-2.diff
> 
> Forget about this one for the moment.  I'm going to post a revision soon.

This fixes an error in the last patch and makes use of a new function,
linux_copyout_sockaddr().  All of the modified syscalls have now been
tested with simple C programs built under DragonFly and Linux.

http://www.gomerbud.com/daver/patches/dragonfly/linux-no43-2a.diff

I'll commit this and the syscall-separation-2.diff after some feedback.

-- 
   David P. Reese, Jr.                                     daver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
                                               http://www.gomerbud.com/daver/