DragonFly BSD
DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2013-07
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

hammer: multipath drives, two different computers ?


From: rektide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:05:01 -0400

Hi DragonflyBSD,

The newly arriving NVM Express PCIe SSDs seem to be rocking an interesting feature: they can be
configured to run a single PCIe set of links, or they can be configured in a dual-port mode.

The obvious and easy use case for these systems is to give each socket in a two-socket system it's
own link to the SSD, giving some systems level failure and a direct path for each CPU.

My question to the list is broad: how, if at all, could Hammer2 be worked to allow two separate
systems to share the same storage device? I'd guess that the "simple" case might look very similar
to mirroring today, except only transaction meta-data would need to get passed to a mirror, as it
already has access to the data, it just needs to know about the changes. Would the mirror have to be
constrained to a stable snapshot as well, or is there nothing to fear with regards to the mirror
reading data from the device the master is actively writing to- will the data that was there however
many ms ago be there, or is there a need to fret about the consistency between the mirror and the
master as the mirror goes to read?

Hopefully I'm asking the right questions. Please feel free to address or disregard any specifics:
I'd love some sharing on what may be possible, and where the snags are. We're going from 0.55GBps
drives to 4GBps+ drives any day now, that's exciting, and high availability computing that can share
that single drive is really exciting to me, and I hope I've wetted some appetites in Hammer-land. I
tend to believe Hammer is in a good position to tap this capability, and thought I'd raise the
notion.

Thanks for the ongoing work of excellence, Dragonfly, keep on!
-rektide



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]