DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2012-08
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.3 and 3.2 releasing
On 8/24/2012 16:50, Sascha Wildner wrote:
> It really should get all the time it needs (in master) but I still think
> nothing should block us from updating our ISOs with fixes that have been
> in the branch for months now, some of them important.
After months, a few more days is insignificant.
> And I still don't
> see why that should depend on unfixed issues. It's not like rolling a
> new ISO is a huge amount of work (most of the time spent is waiting
> until it's built and uploading it), that can't be done again as new
> (important) fixes come in.
If the unfixed issues weren't actively being worked, I'd agree.
> But I guess we can only agree to disagree here.
I guess so.
John
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]