Re: Release 2.12 - 3.0

[Max Herrgard <herrgard@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 18 okt 2011, at 18.09, Alex Hornung wrote:
> ...
> In a summary: 2.12 is broken and the fixes for it need plenty of testing
> (months of testing).
> 
> There are a few solutions that have been proposed for this, and I'd like
> people to vote on them, since we really need to make a decision ASAP:
> ...
> D) Release the broken 2.12 and let users "suck it up".

I wote D). 2.10 is simply too old to make sense, and I don't think 2.12 is in that bad shape. My single CPU x86_64 fileserver runs fine.

Later we would release an early 3.0 when things have stabilize, sure to be better than the older release :-)


Max