Re: wlan_ratectl (was Re: firmware discussion)

[Johannes Hofmann <johannes.hofmann@xxxxxx>]

30175338.GB86744@venus.xenno.com>
User-Agent: tin/1.9.4-20090211 ("Rieclachan") (UNIX) (DragonFly/2.5.1-DEVELOPMENT (i386))
Date: 30 Mar 2010 19:40:44 GMT
Lines: 14
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.64.67.189
X-Trace: 1269978044 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 55376 88.64.67.189
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:14200

Joe Talbott <josepht@cstone.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:50:33AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>>     Well, I guess it comes down to how difficult it would be to integrate
>>     the ratectl we have into the new infrastructure, and whether there are
>>     any plans in FreeBSDland to have an integrated ratectl.  If not then
>>     there is an argument for them adopting ours.
>> 
> 
> Converting the wpi driver I'm porting was not very difficult.  I don't
> like users of the half dozen or so wifi drivers we currently have
> losing the ratectl features we have.

Can the adaption to ratectl be done incrementally (driver by driver)
and have non-adapted drivers working without it?