Re: Source Control system results and discussion

[Michael Neumann <mneumann@xxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     I propose second that we use Git as the master repository and Mercurial
>     as the slave, but allow committers to commit to either and auto-merge
>     in both directions. 

Is it really neccessary to support both git and mercurial? Even if I 
voted for git, I'd be just fine with using mercurial (except that I'd 
probably miss gitk). It's in any case a gross improvement over the 
current situation. Maybe those who voted for mercurial think the same 
way. Of course if it's easy to setup this cross-commit facility, then 
just do it, otherwise I don't see a huge benefit in it.

Regards,

  Michael