DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2008-07
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

From:	Daniel Phillips <phillips@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:02:08 -0700

On Saturday 26 July 2008 17:50, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Why LVM why not follow the ZFS path ?
> 
>     I think its a mistake to integrate the storage layer into the
>     filesystem.  That would effectively limit us to a single filesystem,
>     ZFS.

"Me too".

Daniel

References:
- [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design
  - From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com>
- Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design
  - From: Maslan <maslanbsd@gmail.com>
- Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design
  - From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index]