Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

["Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfgshield-freebsd@xxxxxxxxx>]

Maslan wrote:
> Why LVM why not follow the ZFS path ?

In FreeBSD's case I think the ZFS approach fits very well with GEOM.

Neither NetBSD or DragonFly have an operational ZFS (yet), so instead of 
growing their own fs-specific implementation from the ground up it looks 
reasonable to leverage the LVM effort.

Just my $0.02, of course.

Pedro.