Re: DMA

[Michael Neumann <mneumann@xxxxxxxx>]

Dan M wrote:
> > I've come around to the idea, though - I like the idea of a simple,
> > BSD-licensed mailer.  It's also not really useful to in an open source
> > project saying, "No, don't work on a part of the project that makes you
> > excited!"
>
> I agree. If that makes him excited, why not? I also think there's
> nothing wrong with a good modular, secure design, like that of qmail.
> Doesn't mean anyone has to implement the same code methodology as DJB.
> Although he did mention he is aware of the design... Bruce Guenter
> also uses the DJB design methodology, but not the DJB coding style. It
> would suck to see something new that's flawed and ridden with security
> holes though - that would be reinventing the wheel. Case in point is
> lighttpd. They claimed they were secure, better than Apache, etc. At
> least two remote security holes in the last two versions.... Oh well.

Then lets use nginx :)

The main reason why I use nginx is that it works well and is IMHO easier
to administrate than Apache and lighttpd. Performance and security are
of course a necessity and in case of nginx it's a bonus :)

Regards,

  Michael