Re: DMA (was sendmail bug et al..)

[Bill Hacker <wbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> * Bill Hacker wrote:
> > First glance at the man page, 'dma' looks clean and KISS-driven..
> >
> > NOT listening on port 25 takes care of a whole raft of potential exploits. What 
> > remans is to check errant script/daemon resistance.
>
> If you find any bugs, inconsistencies etc mail to bugs@.

WILCO

> > Do you know if anyone has tried 'dma' on other-than DFLY platform yet?
>
> It is clean C code and should compile out-of-the-box on *BSD.  At least
> dma compiles and works with DragonFly and FreeBSD.  But I'm sure it
> could work under almost all Unixes ...
>
> 	Matthias

I've got one or more revs of most of them up here, plus a few other 
(allegedly) posix-compliant projects.

Will have a go ...

Thanks,

Bill