DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2007-07
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index]
more data:
- irq21 seems to always carry about half of the number of interrupts atapci1 is carrying.
- over large periods, the % busy of ad6 is at 100%, servicing maybe 350 or even 800 requests/sec. I/O speed then is around 3-10 MB/sec. this is with 1.10 and SMP. I'll try compiling a old-ata kernel now.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: poor performance on big machine
| From: | "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:08:10 +0200 |
more data:
- irq21 seems to always carry about half of the number of interrupts atapci1 is carrying.
- over large periods, the % busy of ad6 is at 100%, servicing maybe 350 or even 800 requests/sec. I/O speed then is around 3-10 MB/sec. this is with 1.10 and SMP. I'll try compiling a old-ata kernel now.
cheers simon
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: poor performance on big machine
- From: "Thomas E. Spanjaard" <tgen@netphreax.net>
- Re: poor performance on big machine
- From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
- Re: poor performance on big machine
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- Re: poor performance on big machine
- References:
- poor performance on big machine
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- Re: poor performance on big machine
- From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
- Re: poor performance on big machine
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- poor performance on big machine
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index]