DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2007-06
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[no subject]
<46636C1D.1060203@exemail.com.au> <200706040449.l544nsuZ055654@apollo.backplane.com> <21113.66.195.169.42.1180985845.squirrel@www.shiningsilence.com> <200706042031.l54KVl6r063824@apollo.backplane.com>
From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
Subject: Re: Decision time.... should NATA become the default for this
release?
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:14 +0200
BestServHost: crater.dragonflybsd.org
List-Post: <mailto:kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-Help: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enigB18FB1400ED8AEC7CAFF2F8C"
In-Reply-To: <200706042031.l54KVl6r063824@apollo.backplane.com>
Sender: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Errors-To: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Lines: 50
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.240.41.25
X-Trace: 1180994723 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 794 216.240.41.25
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:11145
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB18FB1400ED8AEC7CAFF2F8C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Matt - how firm are you on calling the next release 2.0? A major vers=
ion
> :number increment usually has a major change with it, and the new
> :filesystem would make sense to match that.
> :
> :We'll get increased attention by going to a 2.0 release, just by virtu=
e of
> :the number, and I'd like to take advantage of that by being able to ta=
lk
> :up a new filesystem (and whatever other achievements we have at that
> :point).
> I'm not firm on calling it 2.0. I'm thinking we shouldn't call it =
2.0.
> I don't like going to two digits on 1.x either though, but we may h=
ave
> to.
call it 1.A :)
I'm feeling uneasy with the 2.0 jump as well, just my 0.02 CHF
--=20
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low =E2=82=AC=E2=82=AC=E2=82=AC NOW!1 +++=
Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
--------------enigB18FB1400ED8AEC7CAFF2F8C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (DragonFly)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGZItzr5S+dk6z85oRAn94AKCx/sJ86C5rlZB9i1pDBOrcaBoCmwCePYoG
R1lXjPVZ9ZtECzVvLc8rlQg=
=PqDY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigB18FB1400ED8AEC7CAFF2F8C--
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]