From: | "Thomas E. Spanjaard" <tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:57:23 +0000 |
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:22:57PM +0000, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:[1] http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au/research/l4/performance.pmlThis has been commented on as bogus before. In fact, most of the Linux on top of L4 benchmarks are somewhat bogus, e.g. the original port was "relatively" fast due to the short comings of the 2.4 kernel in various areas, which got compensated by the L4 port.
Cheers, -- Thomas E. Spanjaard tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature