Re: VOP_RENAME of the future

[Csaba Henk <csaba.henk@xxxxxxx>]

On 2006-08-07, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The current UFS code is complicated, since it didn't have a separation
> between namespace locking and content locking. When you kill the whole
> relocking dance, it becomes much simpler. Noone wants to really clean
> the UFS locking though, because the code base is extremely complicated.

Okay, I'm beginning to see the light. I slowly recognize what a fine
grained locking scheme in the namecache could and should provide.

Csaba