Re: Reviving userland LWKT

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Emiel Kollof wrote:
> Op donderdag 13 juli 2006 01:49, schreef Simon 'corecode' Schubert:
> > Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > [excellent description of a fairly generic protocol]
> >
> > could/would this be used for a possible implementation of NSS, for
> > instance?  I'm thinking of a NSS daemon which can handle standard NSS
> > plugins (ldap, sql, whatnot) and a libc getpwent(3) and stuff which queries
> > this daemon, by some means.  Is this some means possibly the protocol you
> > are outlining, would we need a layer in between (lwkt?) or would we use
> > something completely else?
>
>
> You mean something akin to Netinfo (as it's used on OS X, and how it was used 
> on *STEP)?

I don't know how netinfo works in its internals, but something like it, maybe.  Just netinfo sounds really big and fat and unusable (in my experience).  What I want is something small which just does one thing:  host plugins for NSS and reply to queries.

cheers
 simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature