Re: khttpd

["Thomas E. Spanjaard" <tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
> On 6/7/06, TongKe Xue <xue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >    I'm new to DragonFly BSD; a search for "khttpd" on the dragonfly bsd
> > email archives brings up nothing. I was wondering:
> [snip]
> - Performance (not that much, I've never heard of user<->kernel
> interaction being the bottleneck in a web server system)
> [snap]

Amen brother, I think Tux kinda prove that only for static files a 
kernel httpd is useful; and even then performance was closely matched by 
e.g. thttpd. So all in all, a khttpd is pretty damn stupid :).

Cheers,
--
        Thomas E. Spanjaard
        tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature