Re: MAXSAVEDBLOCKS in netinet/tcp_sack.c

[Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-On [20050826 14:46], Hiten Pandya (hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>Jeroen, that would be a good thing.  Given the complexity of the Selective 
>Acknowledgement and its cousins, e.g. T-SACK, etc; it should definitely go 
>into a separate manual page.

*nods*

Definitely.  SACK is a realm unto itself.  And to overload tcp(4) with it
might be a bit overdone.  This way people looking for sack related stuff can
immediately go to sack(4) and those who look for it in tcp(4) will find the
reference easily.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://www.andf.info/
http://www.tendra.org/   | http://www.in-nomine.org/
Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far...