Re: printf's in cpu_startup()

[Chuck Tuffli <chuck_tuffli@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
. ..
>     The overflow occured because the kernel was improperly calculating the
>     overflow point.  The commit simply fixed the overflow calculation.  I
>     also increased the number of slots available (since 5 slots is 
>     ridiculously low).
>
> 					-Matt


I understood that phys_avail was being overflowed, but what confused me 
was there were already 5 slots (phys_avail[10]). I hadn't seen your 
commit, but from the diffs I understand the logic problem now. Thanks 
for all the help.

--
Chuck Tuffli
Agilent Technologies