Re: phk malloc, was (Re: ptmalloc2)

[Bill Hacker <wbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

er.dragonflybsd.org>	<20050227231003.GA17810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050227160451.083bf7e8.cpressey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <20050227160451.083bf7e8.cpressey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <42226362$0$718$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.253.82.16
X-Trace: 1109549922 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 718 218.253.82.16
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:7862

Chris Pressey wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:10:03 -0500
> Dan Melomedman <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>>All I'd like to see is a way to guarantee physical memory to special
>>processes with an environment variable.
> 
> 
> There are plenty of unused letters in MALLOC_OPTIONS :)  Care to donate
> a patch?
> 
> -Chris

The most effective ones probably being currency symbols - backed up with 
the cash <g>

Wait - isn't that what them funny-shaped blue and orange pills are 
s'posed to 'guarantee'?
'physical memory with an environment variable' is a nice way of puttin' 
it.  (Pun intended.)

(runs for the hills....)

Bill