Re: libdisk

[Robert Garrett <rg70@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Rhodus wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:56:37 -0600, Robert Garrett <rg70@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The recent removal of sysinstall, reminded me of a discussion that
> > basically stated the only consumer of libdisk was sysinstall.
> > I am doing a makworld now with libdisk disabled, and if everything is
> > clean will remove it, provided there are no objections.
> >
> > Robert Garrett
>
>
> I think there are a few ports that make use of libdisk.  Every now and
> then I even write a program that uses it too.  Is there a compelling
> reason to remove it ?
is there a compelling reason to keep it in the base system? should be 
the question. the reason it was put in there was ripped out.

Rob