From: | "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:11:20 +0100 |
Exactly! This should be changed all over the code really, but right nowWas there an style aggrement made on removing all of these void's?http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~virtus/trivial/. They all look completely fine to me. I will commit them within an hour or so if no objections are recieved.Yes, this has been discussed on submit@ a while ago.. Both Joerg and Matt said they could be removed, their email can respectively be found here: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2004-07/msg00152.html and here: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2004-07/msg00173.htmlMakes sense now after I've woken up completely. Removing them also adds better code consistency to the project as a whole.
every now and then it gets cleaned up. Perhaps if I have time I'll write up
a shellscript to remove all (void) casts in the tree (where they should be
removed, of course) and provide a patch. The problem is the inconsistency in
the way they are casted.. I wouldn't want to risk also removing the (void)
argument from e.g. usage(void).. I'll probably be able to avoid that
though..
cheers simon
-- /"\ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part