Re: cvs and new distributions

[David Rhodus <sdrhodus@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:30:29 +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu
<qhwt+dragonfly-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 07:26:13AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> > > -On [20040830 06:12], YONETANI Tomokazu (qhwt+dragonfly-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > >Actually there's no simple way in CVS to add unversioned tree into
> > > >a repository other than by using `cvs import'.
> > >
> > > So the question is, are we going to use cvs import for this again?
> >
> > Why not? I don't see any problem in using `cvs import' to actually
> > import an external codes to our tree. Or did I miss an earlier discussion
> > against using `cvs import' at all?
> 
> Did I receive any response to this message?
> 

There is really no compelling reason to use one over the other(import, add).

-- 
                                         -David
                                         Steven David Rhodus
                                         <drhodus@xxxxxxxxxxx>