Re: modules & options

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05.09.2004, at 14:34, Sascha Wildner wrote:
> is it on purpose that the modules built with buildkernel do not honor 
> the options in the kernel config?

seems so. I don't agree with that, though.

> Is there a way to achieve what I want (kldload vesa but keep debugging 
> output)?

yes:

# Try and detect whether we are being built for a specific kernel
. if defined(MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX) && 
exists(${MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX}/opt_global.h)
CFLAGS+=  -I${MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX}
. PATH: ${MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX}
. endif

. ..

opt_vesa.h:
# .PATH searches only work for targes without source
. if !exists(opt_vesa.h)
        touch ${.TARGET}
. endif


this means: iff the module is built by the kernel Makefile (which sets 
MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX appropriately) and iff opt_vesa.h is found, then the 
kernel opt_vesa.h is picked up. Else the "default" (which should be 
used for modules to be used for most people, i.e. GENERIC ABI 
compatibility) should be generated.

we should use this for every KLD, in my opinion.

cheers
  simon

--
/"\
\ /
 \     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  Against HTML Mail and News

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part